I would like to thank Joshua and Elizabeth for sharing their work and coming in. I am so glad to see these proposals and hear about their research. Thanks for having them.
After reading Elizabeth’s proposal, I am wondering why she
chose to take ENG 462 J. Her proposal
is clearly written. It flows well, her
knowledge and voice come through her piece without overpowering it—she is a
fabulous writer. That is not the question
I wanted to ask her, of course. What I
was wondering were two things: 1) How
was she able to gain access to such (usually guarded and private) IEP meetings?
(I was a teacher, too, and I can only imagine how difficult it is to gain
access to that type of setting) and 2) During her meetings, did she find many
students misplaced under Special Education programs, especially students of
color or non-native speakers and low SES students? I have seen many students in my classroom
that had IEPs that honestly did not need them (I taught in high school), but
they had an IEP since elementary school, and just as her literature stated, it
was almost as if that ‘stuck’ to them—a stigma forever attached. If she found that, maybe that could be
another avenue for research.
As far as what I’ve been working on with ATLAS.ti, I have
not been having the ease that I expected.
I have been trying to get my anchors to show in my transcript for two
days now, to no avail—I am still working on it, and if I can’t get the anchors
in, I will submit my one transcript that is attached to my one video today in
dropbox, but I am very glad now that Ann was able to come to class, because I
am not sure if I would have been much help to the class. I am still trying, and I am not letting it discourage
me. We’re all learners here, and now is
the time to take risks.
Argh - sorry to hear about the continued ATLAS.ti struggles. Let's hope Ann has the magic solution.
ReplyDelete